AI Model Capability Comparison

Browser use

Only models released within the past year are shown. Only benchmarks covering at least 3 of these models are shown. Unknown release dates are excluded; historical data is retained.

— means no published score for this candidate in this source, not zero.8/11 recent-year models have scores

No.ModelReasoning effortCost / taskAverage cost per taskMedian timeMedian task duration
1OpenAIGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Solmedium79.6$1.38 min
2OpenAIGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astramedium77.9$10.779 min
3AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5high75$2.3512 min
4OpenAIGPT-6 SolGPT-6 Solmedium74.4$1.026 min
5AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5high72.7$1.539 min
6AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1high72$5.1917 min
7OpenAIGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Lunamedium64.3$0.0778 min
8AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5high64.3$0.239 min
9AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5medium53.4$0.0925 min

Browser Use

Source: Browser Use ↗ · Updated 2026-10-17

Browser Use Bench v2.1 · medium · Updated 2026-10-17

Browser Use Bench v2.1 · high · Updated 2026-10-17

PandaNpc Updated Oct 21, 2026, 06:01 UTC

Source: Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0 · Vals.ai · Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai)

Column guide

No.
Display order only. Sorting changes this number; it is not a published capability rank.
Model
The evaluated model name and its provider icon. A dash in a score column means no published score is available here, not a zero.
Reasoning effort
medium · high
Score
Browser Use Bench v2.1 reports mean weighted rubric scores (0–100) over 180 browser tasks, not strict task completion rates. Each row keeps the model and reasoning effort separate. Cost per task is in USD; median time is the reported task-duration median. Evaluation methodology ↗
Cost / task
Average cost per task (USD)
Median time
Median task duration (min / s)