AI Model Capability Comparison

Video understanding

Only models released within the past year are shown. Only benchmarks covering at least 3 of these models are shown. Unknown release dates are excluded; historical data is retained.

— means no published score for this candidate in this source, not zero.

No.Model4/11 recent-year models have scores
1AnthropicClaude Opus 5.583.7Claude Opus 5.5
2OpenAIGPT-6 Astra87.5GPT-6 Astra
3OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol—
4AnthropicClaude Fable 5.179.7Claude Fable 5.1
5Google DeepMindGemini 4 Argon91.7Gemini 4 Argon
6AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5—
7AnthropicClaude Opus 5—
8OpenAIGPT-6 Sol—
9OpenAIGPT-6 Luna—
10AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5—
11AnthropicClaude Mythos Preview—

Google DeepMind (model card)

Source: Google DeepMind (model card) ↗

Google model card: publisher results and republished third-party scores, as of October 2026. See methodology for evaluation settings; these are not all independent evaluations. Evaluation methodology ↗

LVBench · Source date unknown

PandaNpc Updated Oct 21, 2026, 06:01 UTC

Source: Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0 · Vals.ai · Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai)

Column guide

No.
Display order only. Sorting changes this number; it is not a published capability rank.
Model
The evaluated model name and its provider icon. A dash in a score column means no published score is available here, not a zero.
LVBenchLong-video understanding benchmark
Tests understanding long videos and answering questions about their content. Frame sampling and input limits can affect results. Evaluation methodology ↗

Read scores within the same benchmark, source and version. Higher values indicate stronger performance on the reported metric, but different columns do not share a common scale.